Addendum - April 25, 2002

• April 25, 2002
  
  Addendum
  
  To covering letter dated March 15, 2002 regarding Private Information #1 Ministry of Transportation Ontario Conspiracy, Fraud and possible Perjury and Private Information #2 David Anderson and Frank Gelinas to the filing of charges for: Conspiracy, Fraud and Perjury as well as forged and falsified documents.
  
  
  On April 24th, 2002 I attended at the Ontario Court of Justice Simcoe with the intent of filing the above noted Private Information #1 and #2.
  
  At 3:45 pm I met with her worship Justice of the Peace J. M. Jukes who I found to be most helpful and cooperative. However, Justice Jukes advised me that in order to file perjury charges they first must be reviewed and approved by the Crown, and I was then directed with my information to the Crown Attorneys’ office where I was informed by Cr. Attorney Aicken that they could not accept my information as there was a conflict of interest, as her father had purchased gravel in the past from our company. I did not recall such purchases, and thought this to be a flimsy excuse for declaring a conflict of interest. I then inquired as to what process would follow, and was advised that an outside Crown Attorney would have to be brought in to review my information, and I was further advised to call Justice of the Peace Jukes Monday April 29th, 2002.
  
  Upon leaving the Court House, I recalled the events that had transpired, and I realized that Crown Attorney Aickens’ real conflict of interest was the fact that in the first request to O.P.P. to investigate and file conspiracy and perjury charges against Mr. Anderson and Mr. Gelinas in February 1997, Constable Thomas MacLean had taken my information to Cr. Attorney Aicken, they had reviewed it and Cr. Attorney Aicken declined at that time to file charges. This then was further investigated at my request by Det. Const. Robert Scott Brantford who took it to Cr. Attorney Swanson who also refused to file charges, while our case under appeal proceeded to make its way through the Justice System with one dismissal after another all the way up to the Supreme Court of Canada, while the Police, the Courts and the Justice System was fully aware of the huge deception of conspiracy and perjury in this promotion of obstruction of Justice as our case worked its way through the Justice System to final conclusion.
  In respect to my attendance at Ontario Court of Justice, I find that Cr. Attorney Aicken has now declined to file these same charges for the second time, and counting Cr. Attorney Swansons’ refusal to file the same charges, we now have 3 attempts to file, and 3 deferments.
  
  It is most amazing to me to encounter a Justice System that works so hard, not to provide Justice, but to in fact obstruct Justice. 
  
  After 8 years of falsities, lies and deception which has almost totally destroyed our business and this family, this is now the end of the conspiracies and spin games by both government public servants and the Justice system.
  
  If this matter is not immediately and properly addressed through “Process” by the courts, I shall immediately proceed to make all information Public in order to expose the law perverted obstruction of justice which our business and this family has been subjected to from the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, the Ontario Provincial Police , the Ontario Court of Justice as well as the Supreme Court of Canada.
  
  I suggest that all concerned, should carefully read the presentation enclosed dated March 15th, 2002.
  
  Thank you for your consideration in the matter.
  
  Yours Sincerely,
  
  
  Gary Nichols
  
  
  P.S. Please find attached one example of Conspiracy to obstruct justice by David Andersons’ perjury concerning Hydro Pit Run at no cost . Ref. Events 1 - 14.
  
  #2. Find example of Conspiracy to illegal interference with business relations of Nichols Gravel Limited, Gravel test rigging event 1983 by Eric D’hond’t and Nil Lambert.