Archive for the ‘history’ Category

November 15, 2007 – Press Release

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Nichols Gravel Lawsuit Against the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Ontario Ministry – Breach of Trust Press Release

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Superior Court Appeal

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Affidavit to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Read our affidavit to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

October 2006 – Letter to the Ombudsman on Ontario

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Read our letter to the Ombudsman.

Official Judgement of the Judicial Review

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Read the documents from our successful case against the government and the official judgement of the Judicial Review.

A Decision in Our Favour

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Read about the decision of her Worship Justice of the Peace W. Casey of the Ontario Court in Cayuga, Ontario on January 28, 2005.

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources – Fraud and Intimidation

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Learn about the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources continued intimidation and fraud against a family business.

Read their intimidating letter.

August 23, 1996 – Review of Appeal Decision

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Review – Appeal August 23, 1996 Decision – Part II

Having reviewed the decision of the Appeal Court with our new lawyer Julian Falconer, and being advised that our appeal was heard in a court without jurisdiction, it was decided to proceed to Leave to Appeal the decision of the Divisional Court.

We immediately continued to investigate this unfair process and the mysterious loss of our transcripts.

See letter of July 13, 1999 appealing to the Honorable Patrick Le Sage, Chief Justice of Ontario to intervene in this questionable Court process.

By letter dated July 16, 1999, a request was made to O.P.P. Inspector Normal Denchert to investigate the loss of our transcripts by the Courts.  
(See letter opp 1)

On July 21, 1999, Gary Nichols reviewed the file #D799/96 and records at Divisional Court Hamilton, and directed another letter to OPP Inspector Denchert with further information.  (see letter opp 2)

In respect to the fact that Commissioner Boniface was aware of the request to investigate, and it was confirmed by Inspector Denchert that there was no investigation or final report, this would seem to also confirm that there was no direction from the Commissioner to investigate.  The obvious reasonfor that is that no on really wanted any information revealed as to what happened to these transcripts or if, in fact, the Justices did receive them.  So the conspired “cover up” continued, as the case made its way through the Justice system.

Equality before the Law?  No selective Justice before the Law, resulting in no justice at all.

Next:  Review of Leave to Appeal by Justices Finlayson, Weiler and O’Connor, JJA, dismissal without reasons, and again without reference to the sworn evidence of the transcripts from the trial before Justice Carvarzan.